Experiments and Observations on Electricity Made at Philadelphia in America — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Read the Text
Transcriber's note: Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_). In view of the difficulty of reliably distinguishing 18th-century variant spellings from typographical errors, the text has been reproduced entirely as printed.
_Philadelphia_ in _America_,
Mr. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN,
Communicated in several Letters to Mr. P. COLLINSON, of _London_, F. R. S.
Printed and sold by E. CAVE, at _St. John's Gate_. 1751. (_Price 2s. 6d._)
_It may be necessary to acquaint the reader, that the following observations and experiments were not drawn up with a view to their being made publick, but were communicated at different times, and most of them in letters wrote on various topicks, as matters only of private amusement._
_But some persons to whom they were read, and who had themselves been conversant in electrical disquisitions, were of opinion, they contain'd so many curious and interesting particulars relative to this affair, that it would be doing a kind of injustice to the publick, to confine them solely to the limits of a private acquaintance._
_The Editor was therefore prevailed upon to commit such extracts of letters, and other detach'd pieces as were in his hands to the press, without waiting for the ingenious author's permission so to do; and this was done with the less hesitation, as it was apprehended the author's engagements in other affairs, would scarce afford him leisure to give the publick his reflections and experiments on the subject, finish'd with that care and precision, of which the treatise before us shews he is alike studious and capable. He was only apprized of the step that had been thus taken, while the first sheets were in the press, and time enough for him to transmit some farther remarks, together with a few corrections and additions, which are placed at the end, and may be consulted in the perusal._
_The experiments which our author relates are most of them peculiar to himself; they are conducted with judgment, and the inferences from them plain and conclusive; though sometimes proposed under the terms of suppositions and conjectures._
_And indeed the scene he opens, strikes us with a pleasing astonishment, whilst he conducts us by a train of facts and judicious reflections, to a probable cause of those phænomena, which are at once the most awful, and, hitherto, accounted for with the least verisimilitude._
_He exhibits to our consideration, an invisible, subtile matter, disseminated through all nature in various proportions, equally unobserved, and, whilst all those bodies to which it peculiarly adheres are alike charged with it, inoffensive._
_He shews, however, that if an unequal distribution is by any means brought about; if there is a coacervation in one part of space, a less proportion, vacuity, or want, in another; by the near approach of a body capable of conducting the coacervated part to the emptier space, it becomes perhaps the most formidable and irresistible agent in the universe. Animals are in an Instant struck breathless, bodies almost impervious by any force yet known, are perforated, and metals fused by it, in a moment._
_From the similar effects of lightening and electricity our author has been led to make some propable conjectures on the cause of the former; and at the same time, to propose some rational experiments in order to secure ourselves, and those things on which its force is often directed, from its pernicious effects; a circumstance of no small importance to the publick, and therefore worthy of the utmost attention._
_It has, indeed, been of late the fashion to ascribe every grand or unusual operation of nature, such as lightening and earthquakes, to electricity; not, as one would imagine, from the manner of reasoning on these occasions, that the authors of these schemes have, discovered any connection betwixt the cause and effect, or saw in what manner they were related; but, as it would seem, merely because they were unacquainted with any other agent, of which it could not positively be said the connection was impossible._
_But of these, and many other interesting circumstances, the reader will be more satisfactorily informed in the following letters, to which he is therefore referred by_
Mr BENJ. FRANKLIN, in _Philadelphia_.
Mr PETER COLLINSON, F.R.S. _London_.
THE necessary trouble of copying long letters, which perhaps when they come to your hands may contain nothing new, or worth your reading (so quick is the progress made with you in Electricity) half discourages me from writing any more on that subject. Yet I cannot forbear adding a few observations on M. _Muschenbroek_'s wonderful bottle.
1. The non-electric contain'd in the bottle differs when electrised from a non-electric electrised out of the bottle, in this: that the electrical fire of the latter is accumulated _on its surface_, and forms an electrical atmosphere round it of considerable extent: but the electrical fire is crouded _into the substance_ of the former, the glass confining it.
2. At the same time that the wire and top of the bottle, &c. is electrised _positively_ or _plus_, the bottom of the bottle is electrised _negatively_ or _minus_, in exact proportion: _i. e._ whatever quantity of electrical fire is thrown in at top, an equal quantity goes out of the bottom. To understand this, suppose the common quantity of Electricity in each part of the bottle, before the operation begins, is equal to 20; and at every stroke of the tube, suppose a quantity equal to 1 is thrown in; then, after the first stroke, the quantity contain'd in the wire and upper part of the bottle will be 21, in the bottom 19. After the second, the upper part will have 22, the lower 18, and so on 'till after 20 strokes, the upper part will have a quantity of electrical fire equal to 40, the lower part none: and then the operation ends: for no more can be thrown into the upper part, when no more can be driven out of the lower part. If you attempt to throw more in, it is spued back thro' the wire, or flies out in loud cracks thro' the sides of the bottle.
3. The equilibrium cannot be restored in the bottle by _inward_ communication or contact of the parts; but it must be done by a communication formed _without_ the bottle, between the top and bottom, by some non-electric, touching both at the same time; in which case it is restored with a violence and quickness inexpressible: or, touching each alternately, in which case the equilibrium is restored by degrees.
4. As no more electrical fire can be thrown into the top of the bottle, when all is driven out of the bottom, so in a bottle not yet electrised, none can be thrown into the top, when none _can_ get out at the bottom; which happens either when the bottom is too thick, or when the bottle is placed on an electric _per se_. Again, when the bottle is electrised, but little of the electrical fire can be _drawn out_ from the top, by touching the wire, unless an equal quantity can at the same time _get in_ at the bottom. Thus, place an electrised bottle on clean glass or dry wax, and you will not, by touching the wire, get out the fire from the top. Place it on a non-electric, and touch the wire, you will get it out in a short time; but soonest when you form a direct communication as above.
So wonderfully are these two states of Electricity, the _plus_ and _minus_, combined and balanced in this miraculous bottle! situated and related to each other in a manner that I can by no means comprehend! If it were possible that a bottle should in one part contain a quantity of air strongly comprest, and in another part a perfect vacuum, we know the equilibrium would be instantly restored _within_. But here we have a bottle containing at the same time a _plenum_ of electrical fire, and a _vacuum_ of the same fire; and yet the equilibrium cannot be restored between them but by a communication _without_! though the _plenum_ presses violently to expand, and the hungry vacuum seems to attract as violently in order to be filled.
5. The shock to the nerves (or convulsion rather) is occasion'd by the sudden passing of the fire through the body in its way from the top to the bottom of the bottle. The fire takes the shortest course, as Mr _Watson_ justly observes: But it does not appear, from experiment, that, in order for a person to be shocked, a communication with the floor is necessary; for he that holds the bottle with one hand, and touches the wire with the other, will be shock'd as much, though his shoes be dry, or even standing on wax, as otherwise. And on the touch of the wire (or of the gun-barrel, which is the same thing) the fire does not proceed from the touching finger to the wire, as is supposed, but from the wire to the finger, and passes through the body to the other hand, and so into the bottom of the bottle.
EXPERIMENTS _confirming the above_.
Place an electrised phial on wax; a small cork-ball suspended by a dry silk-thread held in your hand, and brought near to the wire, will first be attracted, and then repelled: when in this state of repellency, sink your hand, that the ball may be brought towards the bottom of the bottle; it will there be instantly and strongly attracted, 'till it has parted with its fire.
If the bottle had an electrical atmosphere, as well as the wire, an electrified cork would be repelled from one as well as from the other.
FIG. 1. From a bent wire (_a_) sticking in the table, let a small linen thread (_b_) hang down within half an inch of the electrised phial (_c_). Touch the wire of the phial repeatedly with your finger, and at every touch you will see the thread instantly attracted by the bottle. (This is best done by a vinegar cruet, or some such belly'd bottle). As soon as you draw any fire out from the upper part by touching the wire, the lower part of the bottle draws an equal quantity in by the thread.
FIG. 2. Fix a wire in the lead, with which the bottom of the bottle is armed, (_d_) so as that bending upwards, its ring-end may be level with the top or ring-end of the wire in the cork (_e_), and at three or four inches distance. Then electricise the bottle, and place it on wax. If a cork suspended by a silk thread (_f_) hang between these two wires, it will play incessantly from one to the other, 'till the bottle is no longer electrised; that is, it fetches and carries fire from the top to the bottom of the bottle, 'till the equilibrium is restored.
FIG. 3. Place an electricised phial on wax; take a wire (_g_) in form of a C, the ends at such a distance when bent, as that the upper may touch the wire of the bottle, when the lower touches the bottom: stick the outer part on a stick of sealing wax (_h_) which will serve as a handle. Then apply the lower end to the bottom of the bottle, and gradually bring the upper-end near the wire in the cork. The consequence is, spark follows spark till the equilibrium is restored. Touch the top first, and on approaching the bottom with the other end, you have a constant stream of fire, from the wire entering the bottle. Touch the top and bottom together, and the equilibrium will soon be restored, but silently and imperceptibly; the crooked wire forming the communication.
FIG. 4. Let a ring of thin lead or paper surround a bottle (_i_), even at some distance from or above the bottom. From that ring let a wire proceed up, 'till it touch the wire of the cork (_k_). A bottle so fixt cannot by any means be electrised: the equilibrium is never destroyed: for while the communication between the upper and lower parts of the bottle is continued by the outside wire, the fire only circulates: what is driven out at bottom, is constantly supply'd from the top. Hence a bottle cannot be electrised that is foul or moist on the outside.
Place a man on a cake of wax, and present him the wire of the electrified phial to touch, you standing on the floor, and holding it in your hand. As often as he touches it, he will be electrified _plus_; and any one standing on the floor may draw a spark from him. The fire in this experiment passes out of the wire into him; and at the same time out of your hand into the bottom of the bottle.
Give him the electrified phial to hold; and do you touch the wire; as often you touch it he will be electrified _minus_, and may draw a spark from any one standing on the floor. The fire now passes from the wire to you, and from him into the bottom of the bottle.
Lay two books on two glasses, back towards back, two or three Inches distant. Set the electrified phial on one, and then touch the wire; that book will be electrified _minus_; the electrical fire being drawn out of it by the bottom of the bottle. Take off the bottle, and holding it in your hand, touch the other with the wire; that book will be electrised _plus_; the fire passing into it from the wire, and the bottle at the same time supply'd from your hand. A suspended small cork-ball will play between these books 'till the equilibrium is restored.
When a body is electrised _plus_ it will repel an electrified feather or small cork-ball. When _minus_ (or when in the common state) it will attract them, but stronger when _minus_ than when in the common state, the difference being greater.
Tho', as in EXPER. VI. a man standing on wax may be electrised a number of times, by repeatedly touching the wire of an electrised bottle (held in the hand of one standing on the floor) he receiving the fire from the wire each time: yet holding it in his own hand, and touching the wire, tho' he draws a strong spark, and is violently shock'd, no Electricity remains in him; the fire only passing thro' him from the upper to the lower part of the bottle. Observe, before the shock, to let some one on the floor touch him to restore the equilibrium in his body; for in taking hold of the bottom of the bottle, he sometimes becomes a little electrised _minus_, which will continue after the shock; as would also any _plus_ Electricity, which he might have given him before the shock. For, restoring the equilibrium in the bottle does not at all affect the Electricity in the man thro' whom the fire passes; that Electricity is neither increased nor diminish'd.
The passing of the electrical fire from the upper to the lower part of the bottle, to restore the equilibrium is render'd strongly visible by the following pretty experiment. Take a book whose cover is filletted with gold; bend a wire of eight or ten inches long in the form of (_m_) FIG. 5, slip it on the end of the cover of the book over the gold line, so as that the shoulder of it may press upon one end of the gold line, the ring up, but leaning towards the other end of the book. Lay the book on a glass or wax; and on the other end of the gold lines, set the bottle electrised: then bend the springing wire, by pressing it with a stick of wax till its ring approaches the ring of the bottle wire; instantly there is a strong spark and stroke, and the whole line of gold, which completes the communication between the top and bottom of the bottle, will appear a vivid flame, like the sharpest lightning. The closer the contact between the shoulder of the wire, and the gold at one end of the line, and between the bottom of the bottle and the gold at the other end, the better the experiment succeeds. The room should be darkened. If you would have the whole filletting round the cover appear in fire at once, let the bottle and wire touch the gold in the diagonally opposite corners.
Mr BENJ. FRANKLIN, in _Philadelphia_.
Mr PETER COLLINSON, F.R.S. _London_.
In my last I informed you that, in pursuing our electrical enquiries, we had observed some particular Phænomena, which we looked upon to be new, and of which I promised to give you some account, tho' I apprehended they might possibly not be new to you, as so many hands are daily employ'd in electrical experiments on your side the water, some or other of which would probably hit on the same observations.
The first is the wonderful effect of pointed bodies, both in _drawing off_ and _throwing off_ the electrical fire. For example:
Place an iron shot of three or four inches diameter, on the mouth of a clean dry glass bottle. By a fine silken thread from the cieling, right over the mouth of the bottle, suspend a small cork-ball, about the bigness of a marble; the thread of such a length, as that the cork-ball may rest against the side of the shot. Electrify the shot, and the ball will be repelled to the distance of four or five inches, more or less, according to the quantity of Electricity.--When in this state, if you present to the shot the point of a long slender sharp bodkin, at six or eight inches distance, the repellency is instantly destroy'd, and the cork flies to the shot. A blunt body must be brought within an inch, and draw a spark, to produce the same effect. To prove that the electrical fire is _drawn off_ by the point, if you take the blade of the bodkin out of the wooden handle, and fix it in a stick of sealing wax, and then present it at the distance aforesaid, or if you bring it very near, no such effect follows; but sliding one finger along the wax till you touch the blade, and the ball flies to the shot immediately.--If you present the point in the dark, you will see, sometimes at a foot distance, and more, a light gather upon it like that of a fire-fly or glow-worm; the less sharp the point, the nearer you must bring it to observe the light; and at whatever distance you see the light, you may draw off the electrical fire, and destroy the repellency.--If a cork-ball so suspended be repelled by the tube, and a point be presented quick to it, tho' at a considerable distance, 'tis surprizing to see how suddenly it flies back to the tube. Points of wood will do as well as those of iron, provided the wood is not dry; for perfectly dry wood will no more conduct Electricity than sealing wax.
To shew that points will _throw off_ as well as _draw off_ the electrical fire; lay a long sharp needle upon the shot, and you cannot electrise the shot, so as to make it repel the cork-ball.--Or fix a needle to the end of a suspended gun-barrel, or iron rod, so as to point beyond it like a little bayonet; and while it remains there, the gun-barrel, or rod, cannot by applying the tube to the other end be electrised so as to give a spark, the fire continually running out silently at the point. In the dark you may see it make the same appearance as it does in the case beforementioned.
The repellency between the cork-ball and the shot is likewise destroy'd; 1. By sifting fine sand on it; this does it gradually. 2. By breathing on it. 3. By making a smoke about it from burning wood.[1] 4. By candle light, even tho' the candle is at a foot distance: these do it suddenly.--The light of a bright coal from a wood fire; and the light of red-hot iron do it likewise; but not at so great a distance. Smoke from dry rosin dropt on hot iron, does not destroy the repellency; but is attracted by both shot and cork-ball, forming proportionable atmospheres round them, making them look beautifully, somewhat like some of the figures in _Burnet_'s or _Whiston_'s theory of the earth.
_N. B._ This experiment should be made in a closet where the air is very still.
The light of the sun thrown strongly on both cork and shot by a looking-glass for a long time together, does not impair the repellency in the least. This difference between fire-light and sun-light, is another thing that seems new and extraordinary to us.
This volume collects Benjamin Franklin's letters and papers on electricity, written in Philadelphia between 1747 and 1750 and sent to Peter Collinson in London. The preface explains that the material was never intended for publication; it was printed only after being shown to others “conversant in electrical disquisitions,” who urged its release. The result is a work that retains the informal, epistolary character of scientific correspondence, with Franklin proposing hypotheses, describing experiments, and refining his ideas in successive letters.
Franklin's central concept—that electricity is a single fluid that can be transferred between bodies, leaving one deficient (negative) and the other surcharged (positive)—emerges through concrete observations. He describes how a shock from a “large glass jar” passes through the body, and compares common matter to a “spunge” that absorbs electrical fluid. These analogies ground his theorizing in everyday experience.
From Private Amusement to Published Letters
The preface reveals that Franklin's experiments were originally “matters only of private amusement.” An unnamed editor assembled the letters and “detach'd pieces” without Franklin's prior permission, only informing him when the first sheets were already in press. Franklin then supplied “some farther remarks, together with a few corrections and additions,” placed at the end. This publication history shapes the text's structure: it is not a unified treatise but a series of communications, each responding to questions or reporting new findings. Readers encounter Franklin's ideas as they developed, with occasional afterthoughts and corrections appended.
The Electrical Fluid as a Universal Substance
Franklin's opening “Opinions and Conjectures” (1749) lays out his theory in numbered propositions. He defines electrical matter as “particles extreamly subtile” that can permeate even the densest metals. The particles repel each other but are “strongly attracted by all other matter.” This dual behavior explains why an electrified body's excess fluid forms an “electrical atmosphere” on its surface. Franklin then draws an extended analogy: common matter is “a kind of spunge to the electrical fluid,” absorbing it until saturated. The comparison is detailed—he considers pore size, attraction, and repulsion among fluid particles—showing his method of reasoning from familiar phenomena to invisible processes.
Speculative Uses and Cautions
Franklin acknowledges that “the beneficial uses of this electrical fluid in the creation, we are not yet well acquainted with,” though he suspects they are “very considerable.” He then speculates on the dangers of an excess: if the Earth contained as much electrical matter proportionally as a charged iron globe, “the particles of dust and other light matters” would repel each other, with potentially disruptive effects. This passage illustrates Franklin's willingness to extrapolate from laboratory experiments to cosmic scales, while remaining cautious about claiming certain knowledge. The conjectural tone is typical of the collection, which presents hypotheses as “suppositions and conjectures” rather than established facts.
Because the text is a compilation of letters, readers may find it helpful to track Franklin's evolving terminology—for instance, his shift from describing electricity as a fluid to using the terms “positive” and “negative.” The appended corrections and additions at the end should be consulted alongside the main letters, as they contain Franklin's later refinements. This edition reproduces the original 18th-century spelling and punctuation, which can occasionally obscure meaning but preserves the historical character of the work.
Franklin’s letters to London feel like watching a bright, patient mind feeling its way in the dark. That same quiet wonder lives in Faraday’s own notebooks, as if both men knew electricity was never quite theirs to command, only to befriend. A kinship of gentle curiosity, I think. Michael Faraday, His Life and Work — Themes and Context keeps such good company on my shelf.
Victoria Roberts
2 weeks agoWilliam Carter
4 weeks agoIsabella Robinson
1 week agoElijah Perez
5 days ago-
Heather Munoz - 3 weeks ago
Benjamin Franklin's experiments are a cornerstone of scientific history, and this compilation is fascinating. Written with curiosity and methodological rigor, Franklin describes his famous kite experiment and other investigations with clarity. It's a window into Enlightenment-era science and the birth of electrical theory. For anyone interested in the history of science, this is essential reading. -
Jessica Tamara Smith - 1 week ago
While historically significant, this collection is not the best starting point for understanding electricity. The experimental descriptions are overly verbose and lack the clarity of modern presentations. Moreover, many of Franklin's conclusions have been superseded. It's more of a curiosity for historians than a useful educational resource. I was hoping for more insight, but found it tedious. -
Michael Frazier - 1 week ago
Franklin's work is undeniably important, and this book offers a glimpse into early electrical research. However, the language is very much of its time, making it somewhat cumbersome to read. The experiments aren't always easy to follow without some prior knowledge. Still, it's a valuable historical document, and I admired Franklin's pioneering spirit.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.
John Hall
4 weeks ago