New and Original Theories of the Great Physical Forces — Themes and Context
Edition facts
For New and Original Theories of the Great Physical Forces — Themes and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 17,433 words, 1 hr 16 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Astronomy,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
CHAPTER I. PAGE THE SUN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
WHAT IS PROPOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
INTIMATE NATURE OF THE FORCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Sunlight and sun-heat--The great law of conservation--How the spheres are constructed--The great earth-core and its functions--The grand magnetic circuit.
SUNLIGHT, ITS SOURCE AND NATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Its limits--The solar cone--The sun not incandescent--New hypothesis--No borrowed light--The sun dependent--Light as a substance--Velocity of Light.
SUN-HEAT, ITS SOURCE AND LIMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Tendencies to unsettle in science--Present theories--True source--Earth's part in the process--Sun's part--New philosophy--Old phenomena and new interpretations--Aurorae--Well understood processes in confirmation--The ordinary battery--The Great Sun Battery--Heat without combustion--Inter-currents--Solution of the problem.
THE SEASONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Why their varying temperature?--A new philosophy.
GRAVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Its essential nature and its source.
THE ATMOSPHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
A veritable ocean--How constituted--The vito-magnetic principle, its extent and character--Its functions--The air not yet comprehended--Have we been mistaken?--New light--Electrical induction--Its mode of action and illustrations--The character and virtue of the vito-magnetic element.
WINDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Entertained theories erroneous--Their true character--What gives rise to the currents--Purely vito-magnetic phenomena--Philosophical considerations drawn from observation--Whirlwinds, waterspouts, and tornadoes--The Barbadoes--Manufactured wind--Wind within a wind--Winds may not arise from presumed causes--A great cosmical system.
SUN-SPOTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Old theories--Degrees of spot-shadow overestimated--What spots are not, and what they are--They are caused by magnetic perturbations--Inconsistency of accepted theories--Figures that are deceptive--Effects of these wonderful phenomena--Mistaken conceptions--May not be tabulated--Unbiassed estimate of their character and location.
SOUNDS, AND THEIR TRANSMISSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Essential character and mode of progression--Waves have no act or part in their conveyance.
SOME OF THE RESULTS OF THE FOREGOING THEORIES . . . . . . . . . . 79
Extent and character of their influence--Old channels obliterated, and new ones developed--Sentiments changed--Nebular hypothesis--The sun cool, luminous, and habitable--Celestial spectroscopy--Undulatory theories ignored--Light instantaneously transmitted--Telephone--No light nor heat wasted--Extent of the atmosphere of the spheres--The sun's power overestimated.
INFLUENCE OF THE FORCES AS CAUSATION OF DISEASE . . . . . . . . . 84
Meteorological influence--Higher appreciation of the source of disease, and increased efficiency in its treatment.
THE ARTIFICIAL PRODUCTION OF LIGHT, HEAT, AND POWER, AND THEIR UTILIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
WHY WAS NOT THIS DISCOVERY SOONER MADE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Its consummation nearly perfected by many others--Its successful accomplishment plainly foretold by Faraday.
APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
PAGE I.--THE SOLAR CONE, OR CONE-SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
II.--THE SEASONS. SUMMER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
III.-- " " WINTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
IV.--MANUFACTURED WIND. (From DESCHANEL'S Natural Philosophy) . . 66
"If we suppose the sun and fixed stars to be gigantic fountains of magnetic influence, acting upon our globe and its atmosphere, and likewise
Henry Raymond Rogers opens his 1878 treatise with a bold declaration of intellectual independence, asserting that his opinions are expressed with 'an assurance born of conviction' yet disclaiming infallibility. The preface immediately positions him in opposition to much of the scientific establishment, a stance he frames as a duty rather than a choice. The work's language is direct and personal, with Rogers frequently using first-person constructions like 'the author gives but his own personal opinions' and 'he has been unable to accept the usual explanations.' This rhetorical posture sets the tone for a text that blends empirical observation with speculative theory.
A Self-Conscious Dissenter
Rogers's narrative voice is marked by a defensive yet resolute tone. In the preface, he acknowledges the 'responsibility of the position which he thus voluntarily assumes' and admits that his conclusions may seem 'strange and unusual.' He apologizes for 'crudeness in the presentation' due to the brevity of the volume, yet he does not soften his claims. This self-awareness extends to his use of epigraphs from Faraday, Tyndall, and Dawson, which he marshals to align himself with a progressive scientific tradition. The repeated emphasis on personal conviction—'the profoundest sense of duty and responsibility'—suggests a writer who anticipates criticism and seeks to preempt it by framing his work as a necessary, if uncomfortable, contribution to scientific discourse.
Evidence Through Anecdote and Analogy
Rogers builds his arguments by layering concrete observational reports with electrical analogies. He recounts the 1840 Natchez tornado, where houses 'exploded whenever the doors and windows were shut,' and the 1839 whirlwind at Chatenay that carried needlework up a chimney. These anecdotes are presented as evidence of 'magnetic origin and power' in wind formation. He then describes a manufactured wind experiment using an electrical machine, where 'a continuous current' blows a taper flame horizontally. The juxtaposition of historical disasters with controlled laboratory demonstrations reveals Rogers's method: he treats natural phenomena as manifestations of electrical principles, a move that allows him to challenge the 'simple mechanical causation' of solar heating as the sole driver of winds.
Pace and Persuasion in the Argument
The text's pace shifts markedly between sections. The preface moves slowly, with careful qualifications and deferential language. In contrast, the chapter on winds accelerates into a rapid succession of examples: the Natchez tornado, the Chatenay whirlwind, miners' observations, and the Norwich Cathedral flags. The description of the flags—'streaming with a strained, quivering motion perpendicularly upwards'—is rendered in vivid, almost cinematic detail, slowing the reader to absorb the anomaly. Rogers then abruptly pivots to a theoretical critique, listing what 'we should hardly expect' from calorific causes, using parallel clauses to build momentum. This alternation between dense anecdote and brisk refutation creates a rhythm that mirrors his central claim: that forces are not uniform but layered, like 'a wind within a wind.'
Readers should attend to how Rogers balances humility with certainty. His frequent use of 'we' invites the audience into a shared investigation, yet his assertions remain firmly his own. The excerpts suggest a work that is as much about the psychology of scientific dissent as about physical forces. Pay particular attention to the moments where Rogers shifts from reporting to theorizing—these transitions reveal the core of his rhetorical strategy.
That rainy afternoon, Rogers’ storms crackled through my hands, his electrical grip on wind and heat oddly comforting—a man insisting the universe made personal sense. When I set him down, my fingers wandered to the shelf and pulled out The A B C of Relativity — Inside the Classic. Not a leap, just a lean, as if one stubborn imagining had quietly made room for another’s gentle math.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.