Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours (1664) — Inside the Classic
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Read the Text
usually given, did not remove this symptome (For some used the taking of a Vomit, when they came ashore, to cure themselves of the obstinate and troublesome giddiness caus'd by the motion of the ship) reply'd, that generally, upon the evacuation made by the Vomit, that strange apparition of Colours ceased, though the other symptomes were not so soon abated, yet he added (to take notice of that upon the by, because the observation may perchance do good) that an excellent Physician, in whose company he was wont to visit the sick, did give to almost all those to whom he was called, in the beginning before Nature was much weakened, a pretty odd Vomit consisting of eight or ten dramms of Infusion of _Crocus Metallorum_, and about half a dramm, or much more, of White Vitriol, with such success, that scarce one of ten to whom it was seasonably administred, miscarried.
8 But to return to the consideration of Colours: As an apparition of them may be produced by motions from within, without the assistance of an outward object, so I have observed, that 'tis sometimes possible that the Colour that would otherwise be produced by an outward object, may be chang'd by some motion, or new texture already produced in the Sensory, as long as that unusual motion, or new disposition lasts; for I have divers times try'd, that after I have through a Telescope look'd upon the Sun, though thorow a thick, red, or blew glass, to make its splendor supportable to the eye, the impression upon the _Retina_, would be not only so vivid, but so permanent, that if afterwards I turned my eye towards a flame, it would appear to mee of a Colour very differing from its usual one. And if I did divers times successively shut and open the same eye, I should see the adventitious Colour, (if I may so call it) changed or impair'd by degrees, till at length (for this unusual motion of the eye would not presently cease) the flame would appear to mee, of the same hew that it did to other beholders; a not unlike effect I found by looking upon the Moon, when she was near full, thorow an excellent Telescope, without colour'd Glass to screen my eye with; But that which I desire may be taken notice of, because we may elsewhere have occasion to reflect upon it, and because it seems not agreeable to what Anatomists and Optical Writers deliver, touching the relation of the two eyes to each other, is this circumstance, that though my Right eye, with which I looked thorow the Telescope, were thus affected by the over-strong impression of the light, yet when the flame of a Candle, or some other bright object appear'd to me of a very unusual Colour, whilst look'd upon with the Discompos'd Eye, or (though not so notably) with both eyes at once; yet if I shut that Eye, and looked upon the same object with the other, it would appear with no other than its usual Colour, though if I again opened, and made use of the Dazled eye, the vivid adventitious Colour would again appear. And on this occasion I must not pretermit an Observation which may perswade us, that an over-vehement stroak upon the Sensory, especially if it be naturally of a weak constitution, may make a more lasting impression than one would imagine, which impression may in some cases, as it were, mingle with, and vitiate the action of vivid objects for a long time after.
For I know a Lady of unquestionable Veracity, who having lately, by a desperate fall, receiv'd several hurts, and particularly a considerable one upon a part of her face near her Eye, had her sight so troubl'd and disorder'd, that, as she hath more than once related to me, not only when the next morning one of her servants came to her bed side, to ask how she did, his cloaths appear'd adorn'd with such variety of dazling Colours, that she was fain presently to command him to withdraw, but the Images in her Hangings, did, for many daies after, appear to her, if the Room were not extraordinarily darken'd, embellish'd with several offensively vivid Colours, which no body else could see in them; And when I enquir'd whether or no White Objects did not appear to her adorn'd with more luminous Colours than others, and whether she saw not some which she could not now well describe to any, whose eyes had never been distemper'd, she answer'd mee, that sometimes she thought she saw Colours so new and glorious, that they were of a peculiar kind, and such as she could not describe by their likeness to any she had beheld either before or since, and that White Objects did so much disorder her sight, that if several daies after her fall, she look'd upon the inside of a Book, she fanci'd she saw there Colours like those of the Rain-bow, and even when she thought her self pretty well recover'd, and made bold to leave her Chamber, the coming into a place where the Walls and Ceeling were whited over, made those Objects appear to her cloath'd with such glorious and dazling Colours, as much offended her sight, and made her repent her venturousness, and she added, that this Distemper of her Eyes lasted no less than five or six weeks, though, since that, she hath been able to read and write much without finding the least Inconvenience in doing so. I would gladly have known, whether if she had shut the Injur'd Eye, the _Phænomena_ would have been the same, when she employ'd only the other, but I heard not of this accident early enough to satisfie that Enquiry.
9 Wherefore, I shall now add, that some years before, a person exceedingly eminent for his profound Skil in almost all kinds of Philological Learning, coming to advise with mee about a Distemper in his Eyes, told me, among other Circumstances of it, that, having upon a time looked too fixedly upon the Sun, thorow a Telescope, without any coloured Glass, to take off from the dazling splendour of the Object, the excess of Light did so strongly affect his Eye, that ever since, when he turns it towards a Window, or any White Object, he fancies, he seeth a Globe of Light, of about the bigness the Sun then appeared of to him, to pass before his Eyes: And having Inquir'd of him, how long he had been troubled with this Indisposition, he reply'd, that it was already nine or ten years, since the Accident, that occasioned it, first befel him.
I could here subjoyn, _Pyrophilus_, some memorable Relations that I have met with in the Account given us by the experienc'd _Epiphanius Ferdinandus_, of the Symptomes he observ'd to be incident to those that are bitten with the Tarantula, by which (Relations) I could probably shew, that without any change in the Object, a change in the Instruments of Vision may for a great while make some Colours appear Charming, and make others Provoking, and both to a high degree, though neither of them produc'd any such Effects before. These things, I say, I could here subjoyn in confirmation of what I have been saying, to shew, that the Disposition of the Organ is of great Importance in the Dijudications we make of Colours, were it not that these strange Stories belonging more properly to another Discourse, I had rather, (contenting my self to have given you an Intimation of them here) that you should meet with them fully deliver'd there.
But, _Pyrophilus_, I would not by all that I have hitherto discours'd, be thought to have forgotten the Distinction (of Colour) that I mentioned to you about the beginning of the third Section of the former Chapter; and therefore, after all I have said of Colour, as it is modifi'd Light, and immediately affects the Sensory, I shall now re-mind you, that I did not deny, but that Colour might in some sense be consider'd as a Quality residing in the body that is said to be Colour'd, and indeed the greatest part of the following Experiments referr to Colour principally under that Notion, for there is in the bodyes we call Colour'd, and chiefly in their Superficial parts, a certain disposition, whereby they do so trouble the Light that comes from them to our Eye, as that it there makes that distinct Impression, upon whose Account we say, that the Seen body is either White or Black, or Red or Yellow, or of any one determinate Colour. But because we shall (God permiting) by the Experiments that are to follow some Pages hence, more fully and particularly shew, that the Changes, and consequently in divers places the Production and the appearance of Colours depends upon the continuing or alter'd Texture of the Object, we shall in this place intimate (and that too but as by the way) two or three things about this Matter.
2. And first it is not without some Reason, that I ascribe Colour (in the sense formerly explan'd) _chiefly_ to the Superficial parts of Bodies, for not to question how much Opacous Corpuscles may abound even in those Bodies we call Diaphanous, it seems plain that of Opacous bodies we do indeed see little else than the Superficies, for if we found the beams of Light that rebound from the Object to the Eye, to peirce deep into the Colour'd body, we should not judge it Opacous, but either Translucid, or at least Semi-diaphanous, and though the Schools seem to teach us that Colour is a Penetrative Quality, that reaches to the Innermost parts of the Object, as if a piece of Sealing-wax be broken into never so many pieces, the Internal fragments will be as Red as the External surface did appear, yet that is but a Particular Example that will not overthrow the Reason lately offer'd, especially since I can alleage other Examples of a contrary Import, and two or three Negative Instances are sufficient to overthrow the Generality of a Positive Rule, especially if that be built but upon One or a Few Examples. Not (then) to mention Cherries, Plums, and I know not how many other Bodies, wherein the skin is of one Colour, and what it hides of another, I shall name a couple of Instances drawn from the Colours of Durable bodies that are thought far more Homogeneous, and have not parts that are either Organical, or of a Nature approaching thereunto.
3 To give you the first Instance, I shall need but to remind you of what I told you a little after the beginning of this Essay, touching the Blew and Red and Yellow, that may be produc'd upon a piece of temper'd Steel, for these Colours though they be very Vivid, yet if you break the Steel they adorn, they will appear to be but Superficial; not only the innermost parts of the Metall, but those that are within a hairs breadth of the Superficies, having not any of these Colours, but retaining that of the Steel it self. Besides that, we may as well confirm this Observation, as some other particulars we elsewhere deliver concerning Colours, by the following Experiment which we purposely made.
4 We took a good quantity of clean Lead, and melted it with a strong Fire, and then immediately pouring it out into a clean Vessel of a convenient shape and matter, (we us'd one of Iron, that the great and sudden Heat might not injure it) and then carefully and nimbly taking off the Scum that floated on the top, we perceiv'd, as we expected, the smooth and glossie Surface of the melted matter, to be adorn'd with a very glorious Colour, which being as Transitory as Delightfull, did almost immediately give place to another vivid Colour, and that was as quickly succeeded by a third, and this as it were chas'd away by a fourth, and so these wonderfully vivid Colours successively appear'd and vanish'd, (yet the same now and then appearing the second time) till the Metall ceasing to be hot enough to afford any longer this pleasing Spectacle, the Colours that chanc'd to adorn the Surface, when the Lead thus began to cool, remain'd upon it; but were so Superficial, that how little soever we scrap'd off the Surface of the Lead, we did in such places scrape off all the Colour, and discover only that which is natural to the Metall it self, which receiving its adventitious Colours, only when the heat was very Intense, and in that part which was expos'd to the comparatively very cold Air, (which by other Experiments seems to abound with subtil Saline parts, perhaps not uncapable of working upon Lead so dispos'd:) These things I say, together with my observing that whatever parts of the so strongly melted Lead were expos'd a while to the Air, turn'd into a kind of Scum or Litharge, how bright and clean soever they appear'd before, suggested to me some Thoughts or Ravings, which I have not now time to acquaint You with. One that did not know me, _Pyrophilus_, would perchance think I endeavour'd to impose upon You by relating this Experiment, which I have several times try'd, but the Reason why the _Phænomena_ mention'd have not been taken notice of, may be, that unless Lead be brought to a much higher degree of Fusion or Fluidity than is usual, or than is indeed requisite to make it melt, the _Phænomena_ I mention'd will scarce at all disclose themselves; And we have also observ'd that this successive appearing and vanishing of vivid Colours, was wont to be impair'd or determin'd whilst the Metal expos'd to the Air remain'd yet hotter than one would readily suspect. And one thing I must further Note, of which I leave You to search after the Reason, namely, that the same Colours did not always and regularly succeed one another, as is usually in Steel, but in the diversify'd Order mention'd in this following Note, which I was scarce able to write down, the succession of the Colours was so very quick, whether that proceeded from the differing degrees of Heat in the Lead expos'd to the cool Air, or from some other Reason, I leave you to examine.
[_Blew, Yellow, Purple, Blew; Green, Purple, Blew, Yellow, Red; Purple, Blew, Yellow and Blew, Yellow, Blew, Purple, Green mixt, Yellow, Red, Blew, Green, Yellow, Red, Purple, Green_.]
5. The _Atomists_ of Old, and some Learned men of late, have attempted to explicate the variety of Colours in Opacous bodies from the various Figures of their Superficial parts; the attempt is Ingenious, and the Doctrine seems partly True, but I confess I think there are divers other things that must be taken in as concurrent to produce those differing forms of Asperity, whereon the Colours of Opacous bodies seem to depend. To declare this a little, we must assume, that the Surfaces of all such Bodies how Smooth or polite soever they may appear to our Dull Sight and Touch, are exactly smooth only in a popular, or at most in a Physical sense, but not in a strict and rigid sense.
Robert Boyle opens his 1664 treatise on colours with a disarmingly frank preface. He admits the work was written “by snatches, at several times, and places” on loose sheets, and that when he later assembled the papers for the press, some were “very unseasonably wanting.” This candid confession sets the tone for a book that is less a finished system than an avowedly incomplete experimental history. Boyle explicitly states his design is “to deliver things rather Historical than Dogmatical,” and he warns readers not to expect a full theory of colours. Instead, he offers a collection of observations and trials, many conducted under less-than-ideal conditions—lacking proper instruments, flowers, salts, and pigments—and written partly in the country and at “unseasonable times of the year.”
An Occasional Essay, Not a Systematic Treatise
Boyle repeatedly stresses that Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours originated as a private letter to a friend, not as a formal publication. The work’s structure reflects this casual origin: experiments are not marshalled to best advantage, and connections between them “might easily have been mended.” Boyle even notes that the printer’s importunity and his own avocations prevented him from making substantial changes to the order. This self-deprecating account is not mere modesty; it is a methodological statement. By foregrounding the contingent, piecemeal nature of his research, Boyle aligns himself with the Baconian injunction he quotes on the title page: “Non fingendum, aut excogitandum, sed inveniendum, quid Natura faciat, aut ferat” (not to invent or imagine, but to discover what nature does or brings). The book thus presents itself as a beginning—a collection of raw materials for a future natural history of colours.
Deliberate Omissions and the Limits of the Work
Boyle is remarkably explicit about what he did not include. He purposely omitted “the Lucriferous practise of Trades-men about colours,” such as making pigments, bleaching wax, and dyeing scarlet, even though he was not a stranger to them and had made trial of some. He also set aside many experiments from other writers, unless he could improve upon them, because he lacked leisure to insert them and hoped to publish them separately. Furthermore, he avoided elaborate chemical operations that might discourage his young correspondent Pyrophilus. These omissions are not oversights but deliberate choices, shaped by the work’s occasional nature and its intended audience. Boyle’s candor about what is missing—and why—gives the treatise an unusual transparency. He acknowledges that even the experiments he does include may be incomplete, especially those on “Emphatical Colours,” which were left “far more unfinished than they should have been” due to lack of proper materials.
The Voice of the Practitioner: First-Person Trials and Confessions
Throughout the excerpts, Boyle writes in a distinctly personal, confessional voice. He uses first-person constructions such as “I have myself made Tryall,” “I did purposely pass by,” and “I remember that I have somewhere in the Book it self acknowledged.” This is not the impersonal tone of a finished treatise but the voice of a working natural philosopher reporting his own successes, failures, and limitations. He admits that some of his experiments might “afford the Curious somewhat to add about them,” and he encourages readers to repeat and examine his findings. The repeated use of “I” and the frank discussion of the work’s imperfections create a sense of direct communication between Boyle and his reader. This rhetorical strategy reinforces his commitment to an experimental, provisional natural history rather than a dogmatic system. The reader is invited not to accept conclusions but to participate in the ongoing process of inquiry.
The Baconian Framework and the Promise of a Future History
Boyle’s subtitle promises “THE BEGINNING Of An Experimental History OF COLOURS,” and the preface makes clear that this is only a start. He distinguishes between phenomena that nature presents “of her own accord” (such as the changing colours of ripening fruits and fading flowers) and those where human intervention plays a role (like the greenness produced by salt in beef or the redness of boiled lobster shells). He has “not much medled” with the latter, leaving such observations to those without the opportunity to make experiments. This division reflects a Baconian emphasis on collecting natural histories as a foundation for future theory. Boyle also notes that he has treated matters relating to colours in several other writings, so this treatise does not contain all he has to say on the subject. The work is thus positioned as one part of a larger, unfinished project—a candidly incomplete contribution to a collaborative enterprise.
Readers approaching this 1664 text should set aside expectations of a polished, comprehensive theory. Boyle’s preface is the best guide to the work: it is an occasional essay, written in fragments, with deliberate gaps and acknowledged imperfections. The value lies not in final answers but in the detailed, first-person account of a practicing natural philosopher at work. Boyle’s honesty about his methods, his materials, and his omissions makes the treatise a revealing document of early modern scientific practice. Those interested in the history of experimentation, the rhetoric of scientific modesty, or the Baconian program will find much to examine in these pages.
That rainy afternoon, Boyle’s loose, honest fragments about colours felt like a friend thinking aloud rather than a lecture. His insistence on just watching what happens, without forcing a grand scheme, lingered with me. Later, I stumbled onto The theory of relativity and its influence on scientific thought — Key Ideas to Explore, and found the same patient wonder, the same trust in observation over certainty. The rain kept falling, and time softened.
Take a moment to reflect on this book
Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.
Owen White
4 weeks ago